The Rangers need to buy out Henrik Lundqvist
Henrik Lundqvist has one more year on his contract to the tune of $8.5 million. With a severe cap situation looming for the New York Rangers, buying him out is a solution.
This topic is guaranteed to be divisive. As a longtime New York Rangers fan I have seen the team treat players like Ed Giacomin, Brian Leetch and Mark Messier badly, dishonoring their service to the organization. Doing the same to Henrik Lundqvist is the last thing anyone should want to see.
There’s no need to recap Lundqvist’s career or contributions, let’s just say he is one of the greatest New York Rangers ever. But hockey is a business and the NHL has become a league driven by the bottom line. The salary cap has forced teams to make tough decisions in order to succeed. Buying out Henrik Lundqvist would be the direct result of a flawed salary structure, but the salary cap would be the culprit, not only the organization.
It’s not unheard of. Corey Perry was a Hart Trophy winner and an All-Star. He is in the all-time top three in every Anaheim offensive category. He was bought out this summer and is playing for Dallas. Tampa bought out Vincent Lecavalier. The Rangers bought out Dan Girardi. .
The numbers
In a post earlier I went into the Rangers’ 2020-21 cap situation in detail. In their current scenario, they will have a hard time keeping all of their arbitration eligible restricted free agents and replacing their departing free agents (Chris Kreider & Jesper Fast) with anyone equal to them.
Related Story. The 2020-21 salary cap situation. light
The team needs to improve and if the team is betting on Kreider and Fast being replaced immediately by Kravtsov and Andersson, that is going to be a challenge.
Buying Lundqvist out means his cap hit in 2020-21 would drop to $5.5 million, a savings of $3 million. There would an additional cap hit in 2021-22 of $1.5 million, but that would be alleviated when Marc Staal and Brendan Smith come off the payroll, saving $10 million.
In an era when payroll is calculated to the penny, $3 million is a significant amount and can be the difference between retaining Ryan Strome or Tony DeAngelo or being forced to trade them. Let’s not forget the meager return the Rangers got for Jimmy Vesey and Vlad Namestnikov when other teams knew that the Blueshirts needed cap relief.
It would also give the team flexibility to try to go out and sign a free agent for more than the league minimum. They would have the option of going after a Michael Grabner-type ($1.65 million in 2016) as opposed to a Greg McKegg ($750k in 2019).
The non-financial benefit
Buying out Lundqvist would immediately alleviate the logjam in goal. The team would be able to move forward with Alexandar Georgiev and Igor Shesterkin as their two goaltenders. The battle for the top job would be between those two starting next season.
Making such a dramatic roster decision now, will get a tough call out of the way. Considering Lundqvist’s competitive nature and his belief in his own ability, who’s to say that he will not want to play past next season? If so, the Rangers will be forced to say good-bye to their future Hall of Famer in a year anyway since they need to commit to their goalies of the future. Doing it now eliminates any drama next year.
It’s a business decision
NHL hockey is a business. While we all love the history and tradition of the New York Rangers, we also want them to win. The team needs to become a playoff contender for purely financial reasons. Playoff revenue is a significant cash cow for any NHL team and sentimentality has no place when it comes to increasing the profit.
The Rangers have made a significant investment in Artemi Panarin and Jacob Trouba as they seek to get back into the playoffs. While the team is better this year, it is probably not a playoff year. They need to continue to improve and in the NHL that takes money.
More from Editorials
- Rangers’ Playoff Redemption Recipe: Grit and Fresh Hopes
- Rangers’ Roster Chatter: Who’s Making the Cut and Who’s in the Penalty Box?
- These Rangers must learn Peter Laviolette’s ropes before they can fly
- Filip Chytil Could Take Major Steps in the 2023-24 Season
- Looking forward to the upcoming season for Artemi Panarin
On a purely financial basis, a buyout makes sense. On an emotional basis, it would be gutwrenching. However, the next time you are at Madison Square Garden, look at those retired numbers hanging in the rafters. All of the players so honored, except Rod Gilbert and Mike Richter, were discarded.
As much as it hurt, replacing an aging Ed Giacomin with a young John Davidson was the right decision and led to a trip to the Finals in 1979. Harry Howell was sold to the Seals after 17 years as a Ranger. Andy Bathgate was traded to Toronto. Vic Hadfield was traded to Pittsburgh. We forget that Adam Graves was unceremoniously dealt to San Jose after 10 years in New York.
A much better scenario would be for Lundqvist to waive his no movement clause and allow the team to try to move him to a contender ins a salary retained transaction. It would give him a chance to win a Cup and help the team’s cap situation. Even if they agreed to retain half of his salary, it would save the team money the next two seasons as opposed to a buyout.
Consider this. If he knew that a buyout was being considered, perhaps he would agree to a trade to a contender, a trade he would have the right to refuse.
If Henrik Lundqvist finishes his career elsewhere he will still get his day of tribute in New York and it won’t diminish the his achievements as the greatest goaltender in team history. There’s no doubt that Marc-Andre Fleury was hurt when the Penguins let him go in favor of Matt Murray, but how has it worked out for him?
Lundqvist was offered the chance to go to another team when the rebuild was announced. He rejected that option and now the team has no choice, but to make that happen through a buyout, for the benefit of the New York Rangers. It’s not a decision the team should take lightly, but it’s a decision that needs to be made.
This is a controversial topic and there will be a wide variety of opinions. Feel free to weigh in.
light. Related Story. Is Robby Fabbri an option?