New York Rangers: How does Alexis Lafrenière compare to previous 1st overall picks?

Alexis Lafrenière is a surefire star, but how does the future New York Rangers winger compare to previous first overall picks?

New York Rangers fans are still brimming with excitement after winning the first overall pick in the draft, and with it, the opportunity to draft a special talent in Alexis Lafrenière. There is simply no disputing that Lafrenière is Canada’s best draft prospect since Connor McDavid, who was a generational forward prospect. That said, let’s just rip off the bandaid right away: despite his generational hockey IQ, Lafrenière is not a Connor McDavid or a Sidney Crosby level prospect. He falls somewhere below those two players.

In this piece, we take a look at how Lafrenière compares to previous prospects that ended up going first overall in order to begin setting the expectations for Rangers fans. I did this using two analytics tools, NHLe and Game Score Value Added (GSVA), both of which will be explained on the next slide. I then used Lafrenière’s comparables to show how we should expect Lafrenière to perform in his first season as a New York Ranger. Let’s dive in!

What is NHLe?  What is Game Score Value added, or GSVA?

NHLe, or NHL equivalency, is a statistical model that translates points in other leagues to NHL points using historical data. The NHLe model I am using was created by Byron Bader, who has a website called Hockey Prospecting (subscription required) . As an example of how the data is used, let’s take a look at Alexis Lafrenière. Lafrenière’s 112 point QMJHL season translates to 46 points over a full NHL season.  As a sidenote, Byron’s tool also gives examples of other players with the most similar statistical profiles. Lafrenière’s closest comparables are Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov, Alex DeBrincat, Mitch Marner, and Vincent Damphousse.

Game Score Value Added, or GSVA, is an all-in-one statistic created by Dom Luscyszyn of The Athletic (subscription required). The formula for this model assigns values of varying importance to different statistics, such as goals, primary assists, secondary assists, and so on. What I love about this statistic is that it is a middle-ground for people who enjoy macro-analytics but also think that results-driven statistics matter, such as goals and assists. In other words, if you are an excellent possession player but cannot finish or provide assists, you don’t get a free pass because ultimately the point of hockey is to score goals.

GSVA scores themselves are fairly simple to understand, so here are the different score tiers with a Rangers player who scores in each tier.

• 3.75 or greater: A legitimate Hart Trophy candidate. Think Artemi Panarin
• 3.0 to 3.75: An Elite player. Think Mika Zibanejad
• 2.0 to 2.99: A top-line forward or top-pairing defenseman. Think Adam Fox
• 1.0 to 1.99: A top-six forward or top-four defenseman. Think Chris Kreider
• .5 to .99: Middle-six forward or borderline second-pairing defenseman. Think Jesper Fast
• .01-.49: Bottom-line forward or bottom-pairing defenseman. Think Brendan Lemieux
• 0: Replacement forward or defenseman. Think Julien Gauthier.
• Below 0: Detrimental to the team, AHL level player. Think Brett Howden.

Whatever score a player has, all you have to do is double the number to find out the impact that player has on a team’s success. For example, if Mika Zibanejad posted a GSVA of 3.0, then that means his contributions win his team six standings points each season. If Brett Howden posts a GSVA of -.5, that means his contributions cost his team 1 standing point each season.

Who are some of Lafrenière’s NHLe comparables?

Now that we have established what NHLe is, let’s take a look at how Lafrenière’s draft season compares to previous first overall picks going back to Patrick Kane in 2007. We will also throw in Jack Eichel since he would have gone first overall in all but three of these drafts.

2019: Jack Hughes, 50 NHLe points*

*Take this one with a massive pinch of salt. There is no reliable translation data of USHL points to NHL points since Hughes is the first to trek that path. Perhaps the model used Hughes’ totals against NCAA competition, but that was a VERY small sample size.

2018: Rasmus Dahlin, 31 NHLe points

2017: Nico Hischier, 32 NHLe points

2016: Auston Matthews, 66 NHLe points

2015: Connor McDavid, 63 NHLe points, Jack Eichel, 55 NHLe points

2014: Aaron Ekblad, 22 NHLe points

2013: Nathan MacKinnon, 36 NHLe points

2012: Nail Yakupov, 40 NHLe points

2011: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, 38 NHLe points

2010: Taylor Hall, 46 NHLe points

2009: Steven Stamkos, 42 NHLe points

2008: John Tavares, 46 NHLe points

2007: Patrick Kane, 62 NHLe points

It is clear that four prospects here are clearly a cut above the rest: Patrick Kane, Connor McDavid, Auston Matthews, and then half a step below is Jack Eichel. If you have an NHLe of 60 or above, to me that means that you are a generational prospect. Then you move on to the Lafrenière tier. MacKinnon was days away from being eligible for the 2014 draft, so let’s bump him up. Hall, Tavares, MacKinnon, Stamkos, and Lafrenière make up the next tier. We won’t compare Lafrenière to Dahlin, but he should be included in that tier as well.

Hughes may have an NHLe of 50, but I do not trust that number because it is clearly based on his NCAA sample, which I mentioned is quite small. Let’s put Hughes on his own in the next tier below the one I just mentioned. Then below Hughes, you have the Nugent-Hopkins, Yakupov, Hischier tier. Ekblad sits at the bottom of the barrel.

So just to clarify, here are our numbered tiers:

McDavid, Matthews, Kane, Eichel

Lafrenière, Tavares, Stamkos, Hall, MacKinnon, Dahlin

Hughes

Nugent-Hopkins, Yakupov, Hischier

Ekblad

So what can New York Rangers fans realistically expect out of Lafrenière in his rookie season?

The hardest part of this comparison is predicting the role that Lafrenière will play on the Rangers. If he was a right-winger he would step into the top-six immediately, but he joins a very strong left-wing unit. My guess is that Quinn will only be able to keep him there for so long, but that’s just conjecture at this point. Some have argued that this strong competition may limit his rookie year production. Conversely, Lafrenière coming into a playoff-contending team is an excellent situation for him and may result in much better results since he will have more support than the other players in his tier did during their rookie seasons.

For the sake of the argument though, let’s assume Lafrenière earns himself a top-six role early on in the season. The easiest way to predict what Lafrenière’s impact will be is as simple as taking the averages of the data we have here. Let’s start with the projection of the points using points per game (ppg).

Steven Stamkos: 46 points in 79 games = .58 ppg

John Tavares: 56 points in 82 games = .68 ppg

Taylor Hall: 42 points in 65 games = .65 ppg

Nathan MacKinnon: 63 points in 82 games = .77 ppg

That results in a points per game average of .67, which translates to 55 points over an 82 game season. Next, let’s do the same method using GSVA. For this example, we will also use Rasmus Dahlin because GSVA levels the playing field for defensemen.

Steven Stamkos: .72 GSVA

John Tavares: 1.17 GSVA

Taylor Hall: 1.01 GSVA

Nathan MacKinnon: 2.14 GSVA

Rasmus Dahlin: 1.54 GSVA

The average GSVA of those five players is 1.32, which is a very strong second-line value and lines up pretty much perfectly with the predicted surface level production of 55 points in 82 games. I honestly think that is a very realistic prediction for Lafrenière’s rookie season. While he is not McDavid, he is an amazing prospect, and Rangers fans have every right to be excited about him and the impact he will make on the rebuild.