Did Quinn keep Kakko & Lafreniere from being as good as Cole Caufield?
By Steve Paulus
A Rangers comparison
So, does this mean the Rangers made a mistake in 2019 and should have drafted Cole Caulfield instead of Kaapo Kakko? Absolutely not. Is Caufield better than Alexis Lafrenière? No way. We’ve seen flashes of the Rangers’ young stars to know that the best is yet to come.
But the way that the Canadiens have utilized their rookie is a lesson for the Blueshirts. The Canadiens let him play two full seasons at Wisconsin and sent him to the AHL. His brief, successful foray in to the minor leagues gave him confidence as a pro and set him up for success in the NHL. Then, Ducharme played him in key roles, sending a message when he was on the ice to start his first NHL game.
The Rangers two prized rookies weren’t buried, but were not given the opportunity to be a game changer the way Caufield has been. Just look at ice time in overtime, a key opportunity for gamebreakers to strut their stuff. In four games regular season games that went to overtime, Caufield played 3:07 minutes, scoring two goals.
In Kaapo Kakko’s rookie season,he scored the game winner in OT in the team’s 16th game of the season.
The Rangers went to overtime 11 times in the 2019-20 season and Kakko played all of 2:26 minutes in the OT period all season.
This season, the Rangers played nine overtime games and Kakko played 1:53 with Lafrenière playing 3:22.
One of the highlights of Lafrenière’s season was his overtime game winner against Buffalo, his first NHL goal.
That was in the seventh game of the season and you would think that he would have been rewarded for his clutch scoring with more ice time in overtime situations. Think again.
In seven more overtime games the Rangers played 22:44 minutes of OT. Lafrenière got on the ice in only two of those overtime periods and played a total of 2:26 minutes.
So, was Quinn’s strategy the right one?