NHL Network released their latest power ranking of players, and Adam Fox's spot on their list of top 20 defensemen is an absolute joke. Fox is easily a top three defenseman in a class with Cale Makar and Quinn Hughes, and if I gave you three guesses I don't think you'd have been able to nail Fox's actual ranking.
What does the Fox say? 🦊
— NHL Network (@NHLNetwork) August 13, 2025
How about another year in the top 20 for Adam Fox!@NYRangers | #NHLTopPlayers pic.twitter.com/79kMYARUtL
Fox was placed 16th overall on the list, and many fans are rightly calling out how absurd his placement is.
I don’t normally like commenting on these lists but there’s no chance there are 15 better defensemen than Adam Fox lol https://t.co/M4YbUcoNJq
— Evan Sporer (@ev_sporer) August 13, 2025
He didn’t even have a bad year, just a poor 4-Nations for his standards.
— Nathan "Grav" Murdock (@NathanGraviteh) August 13, 2025
Feels like I’m taking CRAZY pills seeing the takes around Fox right now. https://t.co/ReePnVoveJ
Here's a look at the complete top 20, and so reactions to Fox's placement.
Our Top 20 Defensemen Right Now list has a total of:
— NHL Network (@NHLNetwork) August 13, 2025
• 19 total All-Star Game appearances
• 9 All-Rookie team honors
• 6 James Norris Memorial Trophies
• 2 Calder Trophies
• 2 Conn Smythe Trophies
• 9 Stanley Cups
What do you think of our list?@NHL | #NHLTopPlayers pic.twitter.com/0MaGYS04de
Adam Fox Norris voting last 5 years.
— Banksy (@Banx_Leaf) August 13, 2025
This player should be higher than 16th
2025 - 12th
2024 - 4th
2023 - 2nd
2022 - 5th
2021 - 1st https://t.co/PEqHEg0jxW
Adam Fox at 16, genuinely just stop hockey discourse at this point man https://t.co/PVjUbPyiFf
— Nikolaj Ehlers is a Carolina Hurricane (@_MiroToZero_) August 13, 2025
What did Fox do in 2024-25 to deserve a better ranking?
During the 2024-25 season Fox posted a 58.19 goals for percentage, a 55.95 Corsi for percentage, and a 55.32 expected goals for percentage. In terms of goals the Rangers surrendered while Fox was on the ice, opponents generated a paltry 2.29 goals per 60 minutes.
In that same span, Fox and the Rangers averaged 3.19 goals per 60 minutes, which results in a net positive. He ranked eighth in goals above replacement amongst all defenseman with a GAR of 15.5 per Evolving-Hockey. By traditional stats Fox also had a good year finishing with 10 goals and 51 assists for 61 points in 74 games.
What is notable here is that the Rangers as a team scored fewer goals in 2024-15 than they did in 2023-24, and Fox only finished with five fewer assists than the year prior and 12 fewer points. That's significant when you consider a player like Artemi Panarin went from 120 points in 23-24 to just 89 in 24-25.
It appears the overall down attitude on Fox stems from a poor performance at the 4 Nations Faceoff, which is stupid because Fox had another sensational season.
I'm gonna lose my mind. the only way Fox's season "wasn't up to standard" is that he scored a few fewer goals and the team around him sucked more https://t.co/WKNmsJk60J pic.twitter.com/vWn4TFQgVT
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) June 16, 2025
fans saying "he was soft and slow this year" as though he hasn't been soft and slow literally his entire career
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) June 16, 2025
This ranking is continuation of slight that was highlighted in Norris Trophy balloting
Fox finished 12th in Norris Trophy voting this season, and it didn't make sense at all. The award went to Makar with Zach Werenski and Quinn Hughes finishing in second and third, and I wrote about how his overall ranking then was a joke.
"Fox posted a +14.5 sG this season, Hughes was worth +12.2 sG, Werenski had a +5.9 sG rating, and Makar finished +4.5 in sG. This is just one metric, but it is abundantly clear that in terms of 5v5 offense, everyone but Makar had a dominant season in this regard. Fox led the way with a performance that was 21% better than league average, Werenski was slightly behind him at +16%, then came Hughes at +13%, and last was Makar who was just 1% better than league average.
In terms of 5v5 defensive impact, Fox was 9% better than league average, Hughes was 8% better, Makar was 4% better, and Werenski was 4% worse than league average. In terms of special teams of offense on the power play and defense on the penalty kill, Fox has a net rating of 4%, Hughes came in at 3%, Werenski came in 2% worse, and Makar was 4% worse."
I recommend clicking back to that story and checking out some charts looking at Fox's overall performance, and how he deserved a much better fate.
Fox should enter the upcoming season with a huge chip on his shoulder considering how the perception of him as a player has dropped. He will be entering a great situation with a new partner in Vladislav Gavrikov, a new coach in Mike Sullivan, and there's no reason why he shouldn't reclaim his rightful place as a true elite defender next season.